0.0/5 rating (0 votes)

SOME THEORETICAL VIEWS ON PERSIAN AND TAJIK SCHOLARS` CONTRIBUTION INTO ARABIC MORPHOLOGY FORMATION

Avtors

Murodzoda N.

Abstract

The given article dwells on the study of some views on the contribution of Persian-Tajik scholars to the formation of Arabic morphology (sarf). The main objective of the study is to consider and analyze some theoretical views on the place, status, and contribution of Persian and Tajik scholars to the formation of Arabic morphology, taking into account the important role of such individuals as Sibawayh, al-Kiso, Abu Amr, and their theoretical differences regarding the syntax of the Arabic language. It is underscored that the Arabic language, due to its central position in Islamic civilization and complex structure, has been the main object of linguistic research for centuries. It is noted that morphology (sarf) has consistently occupied a high position throughout the long history of Arabic linguistics, since it was considered a fundamental tool for analyzing the internal structure of words and mastering the processes of word formation. However, despite the fact that the history and theoretical aspects of Arabic morphology have been widely studied by Arabic linguistics, this area of research by modern Tajik scholars, especially in the field of Tajik Arabic studies, remains largely without due attention.

Keywords

Arabic language, morphology (sarf), syntax (nahw), Persian scholars, Tajik scholars, history of linguistics, grammar formation, Sibawayh

References

1.    Abubakr Muhammad ibn Siraj. Al-Usul fi-n-nahw /A.M. Ibn Siraj. Research of Abdulhusain al-Fatli. Vol. 1. Third edition. –Beirut: Ar-Risola, 1996. - PP-97.

2.    Ayni, S. Memoirs (four parts). Consists of one book/ S.Aini. – Dushanbe: Scientific editorial board of the Tajik National Encyclopedia, 2009. – 680 pp.

3.    Akmalkhonov A. Views on Word Formation in the History of Arabic Linguistics //Eastern Studies. – 2018. – V. 4. – No. 4. – PP. 124-132.

4.    Dodarov, O.M. The Science of Spending and its Explanation in the Culture of “Haft Qulzum”// O.M. Dodarov. Message of the National University of Tajikistan, 2021. No. 2. - PP.108-113.

5.    Kodirova F.R., Ashrapov B.P. Selected bibliography of printed works N.I. Giyasova // Stephanos. - 2024. - No. 5(67). - S. 148-158. - DOI 10.24249/2309-9917-2024-67-5-148-15. – EDN ATCOQG.

6.    Magomedov A. A., Paizulaev R. P. Arabic Grammar Schools // Language and literature in the educational and cultural space of South Russia and the Caucasus. - 2018. - PP. 69-72.

7.    Miriyeva N. Arabism as a Sustainable Part of the Lexicon of Belarusian Tatars (for example, the book of Ibrahim Hosenevich). - 2022.

8.    Palenko M. S. The Basis of the "Semiotic" Philosophy of Abu Hayyana al-Tawhidi // Historical, philosophical, political and legal science, culture and art education. Theoretical and practical questions. – 2012. – no. 1-2. - PP. 151-155.

9.    Rahimov E. S. R. Questions about the Functioning of Modern Arabic Terminology // Language and culture. – 2016. – no. 3 (35). - PP. 105-116.

10.Sukhorukov A. N., Sukhorukova A. V. The History of the Study of the Grammar of the Persian Language in Iran and Neighboring Countries until the End of the 19th Century. Philological science. - 2012. - V. 25. - no. 3-1. - PP. 272-279.

11.Ghiyosov N. I. Morphological Peculiarities and Level of Usage of Weights of Arabic Broken Plural Forms in “Tarjumai Ta'Rikhi Yamini” by Jurfodiqoni / N. I. Ghiyosov, B. P. Ashrapov // Bulletin of Tajik State University of Law, Business and Politics. Series of Humanitarian Sciences. – 2023. – No. 2(95). – PP. 87-96. – DOI 10.24412/2413-2004-2023-2-87-96. – EDN BNSJAY.

12.Gorji M., Aslani S., Rahimi Khooyegani M. The Position and Influence of Persian and Persian Poets on Theorists of Islamic Literature //Journal of Comparative Literature. – 2022. – V. 14. – №. 26. – PP. 257-289.

13.Kaye A. S. Arabic Morphology //Morphologies of Asia and Africa. – 2007. – V. 1. – PP. 211-247.

14.Sara S. Monique Bernards, Changing Traditions: Al-Mubarrard's Refutation of Sibawayh and the Subsequent Reception of the Kitab, Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 23 (Leiden: EJ Brill, 1997). PP. 344. $124.00 cloth //International Journal of Middle East Studies. – 2004. – V. 36. – №. 2. – PP. 277-278.

15.Versteegh K. Redundance and Suppression According to Sībawayhi and al-Farrā //The IOS Annual Volume 21. “Carrying a Torch to Distant Mountains”. – 2021. – 359 pp.

16.Wright W., Caspari C. P. A Grammar of the Arabic Language. – Cosimo, Inc., 2011.

Publication date

Thursday, 12 June 2025