The article under consideration dwells on the study of the terms beset with kinship and blood affinity in Uzbek and English languages. Some issues of comparative study dealing with the lexicon of languages of different grammar structures are considered by the author of the article. The author elicits the substantial plan of lexico-sematic terms of kinship and blood affinity referring to feminine sex in comparative languages. The meanings of kinship and blood affinity in reference to feminine persons both in Uzbek and English are divided into two groups: a) meanings of kinship of feminine persons in pursuance with direct line; b) meanings of kinship of feminine person in pursuance with lateral line. In the course of the research the author distinguished two groups of methodological approaches: 1) semasiological; 2) onomasiological. Particular attention is paid to the importance of an application of componential method of study dealing with the terms of kinship and blood affinity in the languages of different structure as well.
synchronical-comparative study, lexics, lexical layer, grammatical structure, comparative method, semantic signs, componential analysis, semasiology, onomasiology
1. Abdualiyeva Z.U. Economy Relations of Zoonim with General Meaning «male sheep/female sheep» in the Plane of Functional-Semantic Microsystem // Bulletin of the Tajik State University of Law, Business and Politics. – Khujand, 2013, - #1(53). – pp. 224 – 229. (in Russian)
2. Abayev V.I. On Kinship Relations and Relationship Terms Accepted by Ossettians // Engels and Linguistics. – M.: Science, 1971. – pp. 239 – 242. (in Russian)
3. Apresyan Yu.D. Ideas and Methods of Modern Structural Linguistics. – M.: Enlightenment, 1966. – 301 pp. (in Russian)
4. Apresyan Yu.D. Lexical Semantics. – The 2-nd edition, revised and enlarged. – M.: Languages of Russian Culture; Publishing firm «Oriental Literature» under Russian Academy of Sciences, 1995. – V. VIII. – 472 pp. (in Russian)
5. Blokh M.Ya. Theoretical Grounds of Grammar. – M.: Higher School, 1986. – 160 pp. (in Russian)
6. Yukhman M.M. Pre-Indo-European Terms of Relationship in Germanic Languages // In memory of academician I.Ya. Marr. – M., – L., 1978. – pp. 93 – 115. (in Russian)
7. Djafarov G.G. Terms of Relationship in Semantic System and Grammar Structure of Language // ST, 1974, - #3. – pp. 22 – 32. (in Russian)
8. Jespersen O. Philosophy of Grammar. – M., 1958 (in Russian)
9. Kononov A.N. To the Etymology of the Word «aghyl» (son) // Philology and History of Mongolian Peoples. To the memory of academician Vladimirtsov B. Ya. – M., 1958. (in Russian)
10.Krongauz M.A. Semantics. - M.: Publishing-house of the Russian State Humanitarian University, 2001. – 399 pp. (in Russian)
11.Kubryakova Ye.S. Nominative Aspect of Discourse Activity. – M.: Science, 1986. – 156 pp. (in Russian)
12.Lopatin V.M. Suppletivism // Russian Language. Encyclopedia. – M., 1969. – pp. 80 – 86. (in Russian)
13.Mametov A. On Relationship Terms in the Crimean-Tatarian Language // Soviet Turcology. – Baku, 1980, - #5. – pp. 70 – 76. (in Russian)
14.Musayev K.M. Principal Problems of Studies in Regard to Language Vocabulary // Soviet Turcology, 1978, - #3. – pp. 33 – 41. (in Russian)
15.Narziyeva M. Componential Analysis of Relationship Terms // Uzbek Language and Literature. – Tashkent, 1980, - # 4. – pp. 47 – 48.
16.Pokrovskaya A.A. Relationship Terms in Turkic Languages // Historic Evolution of Lexis of Turkic Languages. – M.: Publishing-house of the USSR Academy of Sciences, 1961. – pp. 11 – 81. (in Russian)
17.Seliverstova O.H. Works on Semantics. – M.: Languages on Slavonic Culture, 2004. – 959 pp. (in Russian)
18.Arens H. Linguistic-Science. – Munich, 1955. (in German)
19.Bruxot F. Thought and Language. – Paris, 1922. (in French)
20.Mathesies V. The New in Linguistic Studies // Classical Patterns of Prague School Referring to 1925 – 1945. Czech academy of native and general Slavonic linguistics. Czech Council. – Prague, 1972. – pp. 5 – 17. (in Czech)