In the focus of attention there are the problems of scientific description of structural-semantic peculiarities possessed by the verbs of thinking in correlated languages as in the complex system of verbal formation inherent in these two languages a special semantic microfield is composed by the verbs with a common meaning “to carry out the process of thinking” and by those ones belonging to the same class and having different nuclear meanings of the type “imagine”, “believe”, “decide”, “deem”, “understand”, “be mistaken” and others. The goal of the article is to study semantics and structure of self-sufficient units in complex entity. Keeping in mind an interaction of three categorical-semantic signs constituting the structure of the verbs of thinking afforded to clear out the interaction of contents and form which gave a possibility for the constructs in question to function as units having different forms and meanings. The description of the models of thinking forms confirms the idea of principal difference in structural-quantitative framework of the components pertaining to the verbs of thinking in Russian and Tajik languages.
Key-words: verbs of thinking, description of semantics, microfield, thinking process, nuclear meaning, diversity of components, categorical-semantic feature
1. Gak V. G. Linguistic Transformations. – M.: The School “Languages of Russian Culture”. 1998. – 768 pp.
2. Kubryakova Ye.S. Types of Language Meanings: Semantics of a Derivative Word. – M., 1981. – 174 pp.
3. Lopatin V. V. Birth of Word. – M., 1973. – 140 pp.
4. Lekant P. A. Modern Russian Language. Manual for Higher Schools. – M.: Drofa. 2007. – 557 pp.
5. Makovsky M. M. Linguistic Combinatorics. – M., 1988. – 132 pp.
6. Meshchaninov I. I. Problems of Language Development. – L.: Science, 1975. – 352 pp.
7. Ulug-zade S. The Morning of our Life. – M., 1984. – 107 pp.
8. Ulug-zoda S. The Morning of our Youth. – Dushanbe: Cognition, 1982. – 118 pp.